Most delegates come home, mean to follow up, and don't. A short, practical routine for the fortnight after that makes the trip worth what it cost.
Short answer: within a week, message everyone you said you would and send what you promised. Within two, write something public about what you learned and report back to whoever funded you. Those two habits are the entire difference between a trip and a turning point.
Send what you said you would. People remember unkept small promises more than they remember conversations. If you said you would share a paper, share it.
Message the people you actually spoke with. Not everyone whose card you took. One specific line each — reference the conversation, not the event.
"You mentioned the licensing problem with community radio — I found the regulation we couldn't remember, attaching it."
That gets answered. "Great to meet you at the summit!" does not.
Write your notes up properly while names still attach to faces.
If a university fund, an employer or a local sponsor paid part of your costs, send them something within two weeks. A page, a few photographs, three things you learned.
Almost nobody does this. The ones who do get funded again, and get asked to speak, and become the person their institution sends next time.
A post, an article, a talk at your department. It does three things: it forces you to work out what you actually think, it makes you findable by the people you met, and it becomes evidence in your next application.
It does not have to be long. Three hundred honest words beat a report nobody reads.
The people are the durable part. A group chat that stays active for a month usually dies; one person you check in with twice a year lasts a decade.
Pick two or three. Actually keep them.
The best time to apply for a second programme is while you can still describe the first one concretely. Your application is materially stronger this month than it will be next year.
Within a week, while people still place your name. Send anything you promised in the same message.
Something specific from your conversation — a paper, a contact, an answer to something you both wondered about. Generic "nice to meet you" messages rarely get replies.
Some funders require it. Even where none is required, sending one to a university fund, employer or sponsor markedly improves your chances of being funded again.
Choose two or three rather than everyone, and contact them a couple of times a year with something useful. Small and sustained beats a large group chat that dies in a month.
Every event page has its own registration form. Places on each programme are limited.
See upcoming events
Guidefunding
The phrase is used loosely across the youth conference sector. Here is how to read a funding offer properly, and the four costs that are most often left with you.
3 min read
Guideapplications
Most applications are lost on the same handful of avoidable things. A practical sequence, from choosing a programme to the week before you fly.
3 min read
Guidechoosing
The terms are used interchangeably in listings and they are not interchangeable. What each format usually involves, and what that means for who should apply.
3 min read